Koinonia Creekwalker...seasons of the stream....
tozhannah
read my profile
sign my guestbook

Visit tozhannah's Xanga Site!

Message: message me


Member Since: 8/4/2003

SubscriptionsSites I Read

Blogrings
BibleReaders
previous - random - next

The Christian Perspective of Life
previous - random - next

! Christian Thinkers
previous - random - next

Simple Christianity
previous - random - next

Question_Everything
previous - random - next


Posting Calendar

|<< oldest | newest >>|
view all weblog archives

Get Involved!

Suggest a link

Recommend to friend

Create a site


Wednesday, February 11, 2009

"Common ground for a common good" seems to be the new mantra of the communitarians amongst us.  I am not sure, exactly, how one defines a communitarian, but it appears to be the new terminology for those who believe the values and beliefs of all people should be reduced to the lowest common denominator and everybody should be compelled to help foster that "common good."  This utopian mindset maintains that if everyone believes the lowest common denominator and nothing more, then disagreement and dissent will be eliminated. 

Of course, this will never work because of humankind's sin nature, but most communitarians believe that people are basically good.  Hm.  Is this a disaster in the making?


Tuesday, February 03, 2009

I am pondering the differences between pleasure, happiness, and joy.  Pleasure seems to be derived from the physical realm;  whereas, happiness is a factor of the mind's interpretation of circumstances, yet true joy is derived from the Spirit.  So, is contentment separate from pleasure, happiness, and joy, or is it a form of one of them?


Monday, February 02, 2009

So, I am wondering if this thing still works.  I guess so if I can figure the new system out. 


Saturday, August 05, 2006

 “The Engineering of Consent”

 

            Béarnaise is a classic French cooking sauce made from tarragon vinegar, white wine, shallots, and egg yolks. This delicate sauce is used to “dress-up” beef and chicken dishes, giving them a gourmet presentation and a unique French flavor.  The addition of béarnaise sauce can make even a lowly cut of meat seem elegant and desirable.  Perhaps, then, there is some irony in the fact that Eddie Bernays’s name is similar to béarnaise. Although not a familiar name to most Americans, Eddie Bernays has impacted daily life in the United States, and the world, through his development of public relations techniques.  Bernays taught people how to engineer public agreement through the use of mind manipulation.  Using psychology and sociology, Eddie Bernays maintained that people could be controlled, influenced and “engineered to consent” to a “common good.”  Furthermore, Bernays believed that this manipulation was necessary for a democracy to survive.  So, like covering a lowly cut of meet with a delicious béarnaise sauce, Eddie Bernays developed ways to make unappealing ideas seem good, right, and acceptable to the masses, even when the ideas might not otherwise be very palatable.

 

             Edward Bernays was born in 1891, in Vienna, Austria, but he grew up in the United States.  He was the nephew of Sigmund Freud, a fact that Bernays, during his lifetime, let no one forget (SourceWatch 1).  Larry Tye, Boston Globe reporter and author of The Father of Spin, states, “Eddie Bernays himself desperately craved fame and a place in history” (1).  To gain this fame, Bernays worked tirelessly on his techniques:  to control the masses, to influence people’s choices, and to engineer the public’s consent. 

 

            First, Bernays believed that democracies needed to control people through mind manipulation because physical coercion was lacking in such a form of government.  He asserted that a democracy without propaganda would disintegrate into complete disorder and confusion (Tye 2).  In his book Propaganda, Bernays “argued that scientific

manipulation of public opinion was necessary to overcome chaos and conflict in society” (Tye 2).  He also maintained that the power elite in any government needed to “pull the wires which . . . [controlled] the public mind” (Tye 2).  In his autobiography, Biography of an Idea, Bernays notes his “shock” upon discovering that his book Crystallizing Public Opinion was heavily used by the Nazis, planning and organizing their termination campaign against the Jews in accordance with Bernays’s mind control principles (Tye 2).  Nevertheless, Bernays’s choice to include this disgusting example shows some pride in the effectiveness of his techniques.  Bernays, despite the destructive use of his ideas during World War II, continued to maintain the necessity of mind control in democratic countries.

 

            A second point which Edward Bernays promoted was the need for influencing the beliefs of people. He commonly used the propagandistic technique of appealing to experts in order to sway public opinion.  For example, Bernays once conducted a survey of doctors who agreed to the printed statement that a “hearty breakfast” was good for people.  Then Bernays, working for a bacon company, went on to publish informational tracts saying that doctors agreed that a hearty breakfast, like bacon and eggs, helped people to stay healthy and productive during a lifetime (Spiegel).  Bernays, working for the American Tobacco Company, pulled off a similar persuasion by connecting women’s smoking to women’s rights and liberation (Tye 3).  Throughout his career in public relations, Bernays worked for Proctor and Gamble, CBS, the American Tobacco Company, General Electric, and Dodge.  The concepts of Eddie Bernays have infiltrated much of modern political life in the United States and the world.  President Calvin Coolidge was actually a client of Bernays, and Franklin Roosevelt carried on correspondence with him.  In the 1950s, Bernays, working for the United Fruit Company, was instrumental in undermining the moderate government of Guatemala by labeling it a “banana republic” and pro-communist.  In this manner, Edward Bernays was able to influence the thinking of millions of people and numerous members of the United States Congress (SourceWatch 2).

 

            A third point which Bernays promoted was the “engineering of consent” (SourceWatch 2).  He felt that controlling and influencing the masses was not enough; sometimes, people needed to believe that they had given their consent, agreement to an idea.  Because of his connection, promotion, and agreement with Sigmund Freud, Bernays sought to find ways to “unearth [people’s] unconscious drives and hidden motives” (Tye 2).  Bernays used this information to persuade people to agree to a specific point, value, or belief. He asserted that this was a natural and good thing to do.  In a Bill Moyer's interview, Bernays stated that he “hoped it was ‘proper-ganda’ and not ‘improper-ganda’” (Tye 2).  However, during his lifetime, Bernays seemed to determine the “proper” from the “improper” by who was paying him.

 

            Like serving a hamburger patty or pre-formed chicken nuggets covered with gourmet béarnaise sauce, Eddie Bernays specialized in taking ideas and making them appear good, attractive, and desirable, even when they were not.  In other words, Eddie Bernays taught the world how to “spin” the truth and make it seem different from what it really is.  Although Bernays never actually reached the pinnacle of popular success for which he hoped, the effects of his techniques are still impacting the world as it now is.  Therefore, people need to wake up and be aware that the ideas of Eddie Bernays have spawned many chefs in the corporate, philanthropic and governmental arenas who know how to cook up a lot of bologna and cover it with delectable béarnaise sauce. 

 

 

Works Cited

Links Don't Work; Cut and Paste

 

“Edward Bernays.”  SourceWatch.  Center for Media and Democracy  11 Feb 2006.

          02 Aug. 2006 <http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Edward_Bernays>.

 

 

Spiegel, Alix.  “Freud’s Nephew and the Origins of Public Relations.”  NPR on the Web 

         22 Apr. 2005.  02 Aug. 2006

            <http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4612464>.

 

 

Tye, Larry.  “The Father of Spin: Edward L. Bernays & the Birth of PR.”  PR Watch

           10 Oct. 2004.  02 Aug. 2006 <http://prwatch.org/node/184>.

 


Saturday, July 08, 2006

The Rise of Neo-evanglicalism

6. Although not mentioned in Mark Noll’s book, another possible turning point in Christian history might be the rise of "Neo-evangelicalism." The Age of Enlightenment, the publication of Charles Darwin’s Origin of the Species, and the assault on the Bible led by Julius Wellhausen combined to weaken the resolve of some in the Church to rely on the revelation of Scripture only. Thus, the birth of liberal theology caused a chasm in Protestantism. Liberals (mainline denominations) considered and consider reason to be of greater import than revelation. According to their logic, Christianity must change in accordance with culture and scientific advance — cultural relevance. Conservative Christians, on the other hand, stood/stand with the truth of God’s Word — biblical revelation.

At the turn of the 20th century, conservative Christians tended to gravitate toward one of three camps: fundamentalism, evangelicalism, or Pentecostalism. Although all three groups affirmed similar doctrine (divinity of Christ, virgin birth, atonement, and resurrection), belief in the inerrancy of the Bible was not shared. Evangelicals tended to affirm the Bible as the inspired Word of God. They also were not as separatist as the Fundamentalists. Yet, both Fundamentalists and Evangelicals tended to hold Pentecostalism "at arm’s length."

In 1942, the National Association of Evangelicals (NAE) was created. Five years later, Fuller Theological Seminary was formed. These two organizations provided the ground work for the formation of the "New Evangelicals." The term was first used in 1948 by Harold Ockenga, former president of the NAE and one of the founders of Fuller. Ockenga maintained that the church should not be separate from the world but should interact with the world in the social, political, and economic arenas of life.

Today, New Evangelicalism is thriving. It believes that confronting the world with its sin is not an effective method of bringing people to Christ. Therefore, proponents of this group seek to promote the love of God, not repentance and obedience, as the foundation of Christian belief. Scripture is to be approached with an "open mind;" sermons are to be positive and uplifting, congregants are to taught to become "agents of social change," and cooperation, consensus, and relevance are virtues that trump biblical revelation. New Evangelicalism frequently trashes church tradition, premillennialism, Bible study, and people who still believe in the Bible as the inerrant Word of God. In fact, New Evangelicalism is known to commonly portray Bible-believing Christians as harsh, intolerant, and not God-loving. In contrast to Pentecostalism, Fundamentalism, and Old Evangelicalism, all of which deal with humankind’s sinfulness, New Evangelicalism attempts to bring people to Christ by showing them the love of God by doing good deeds: eradicating poverty, equalizing the distribution of wealth in the world, curing AIDS, saving the environment, etc., etc., and etc. To this end, New Evangelicalism has no problem partnering with whatever secular and/or religious (non-Christian) groups that share the same goals. It believes in "infiltration" rather than "biblical separation." In the words of one Bible commentator, the New Evangelicals are the new liberals. Is this a 20th and 21st century turning point in Christian history?



Next 5 >>